Subscribe:      
 
    Tell A Friend  
  From   

« Another Whiff of Reality From Caroline Glick | Home | An Untold Story »

The Washington Post Questions Bush's Israel Policy
[07.21.2006]
Comments (11) | Trackback (0) Digg This | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Google | Yahoo!

Comments
Thank-you afor these open and honest comments. I support Israel.
 
Posted by: Elaine Gail at July 23, 2006 8:01 AM
 
Who reads the Washington Post anyway? Just the Liberals! If the general public really thinks this way and if our government subscribes to this thought process, they will soon be lobbing those missiles and rockets right into our cities. It would not surprise me for it to happen across our porous borders. I really think the mechanisms for a dirty bomb or something that could very serious damage are already in place. They are just waiting for the signal and the trigger will be pulled. Then the Post will sing a different tune, if, indeed it can still sing.
 
Posted by: D M Street at July 22, 2006 11:32 PM
 
It has never been popular to stand for the minority opinion, especially when there is such a bias against having any fair and open discussion. President Bush may have done a lot of not so smart things, but he is RIGHT when he is right. It is amazing that the conservative side is way more open than the the liberal.
 
Posted by: mary thiels at July 22, 2006 2:04 PM
 
Does the Post think ALL Americans are stupid? People may not always respond to the lies that the Post prints, but that doesn't mean they're convincing everyone. Most Americans can think for themselves.
 
Posted by: Rose Ann Monopoli at July 22, 2006 12:12 AM
 
Should FDR have been an 'honest broker' between the Nazi's and europe in WW2. The Isreali's are right! Is there anyone in their right mind who thinks that there would be a war in the middle east if Isreal's nieghbors were Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark and Finland. The reason you have war in the middle east is because Isreal is surrounded by Muslim nations who hate jews. In that situation Bush shouldn't be an 'honest broker'. He should do what is right.
 
Posted by: jim at July 21, 2006 9:03 PM
 
I believe that Israel should remove all Hezzbolah from Lebanon, then go after Syria, the more they kill the less America will have to do. and maybe we should ship some of our terrorist loving liberals over there to join them.
 
Posted by: Otto Foust at July 21, 2006 9:02 PM
 
I completely agree and am proud of our president to be on the side of Israel and not on the side of Hezbollah which started and continue to send rockets into civilian areas. Wouldn't you react like Israel if this was done in your cioty? I am proud of the stand that our president Bush has taken.
 
Posted by: Lolita Zamir at July 21, 2006 3:06 PM
 
The Washington Post has it's own agenda of trying to make Israel look like an agressor; when in fact the terrorist for years and years have contnually sought to destroy them. It is easy for them to report what they think in their cozy office buildings because they have no one dropping rockets on their positions. They do not promote good journalism;and I certainly do not belive in what their uninformed opinions state.
 
Posted by: Joe Ramirez at July 21, 2006 2:08 PM
 
The left has a pension for making an outlandish statement as if it were fact and then based on that falsehood proceeds to project future sequence of events. For example; "...the Israeli campaign in Lebanon in the early 1980's helped create the conditions for the rise of Hezbollah? Then they go on implying that regardless of who started the conflict Israel the cause of all the trouble in the Middle East. This gets people trying to argue about the assumption not lie it is based on.
 
Posted by: Vladimir Val Cymbal at July 21, 2006 1:47 PM
 
The Washington Post has had an anti-Israel slant to its reporting for as long as I can remembers (and I've been a subscriber to it for a LONG time) Hezzbolah starts the problem, continues to send rockets into civilian areas and the Post thinks Israel is over-reacting. As a Washingtonian, if someone shot a missile at us, I'd expect a much stronger response than Israel is showing...and so would the Washington Post's writers and editors.
 
Posted by: Emily at July 21, 2006 11:54 AM
 
Post are professional liars - gave up on the Washington Post Decades Ago. None of our business associates in the US have any time for the "Iranian Post"
 
Posted by: Jack MacLeod at July 21, 2006 11:39 AM
 
 
Post a Comment
(Not Displayed)
 
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.onejerusalem.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/502
 
Sign Israel Petitions!
 
 
Sign Jerusalem Petition
 
Sign Temple Mount Petition
 
Send Me One Jerusalem Updates
United Jerusalem Petition
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, to ensure free and open access for all people.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, as an expression of the unique relationship between the Jewish People and its eternal capital.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, so as never to return to the dark period of 1947-67, when Arab control over an artificially divided Jerusalem meant religious persecution, desecration of holy sites, and wanton destruction.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, according to the current municipal boundaries, set in the wake of Israel’s defensive 1967 Six Day War.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, where Jews may enjoy the right to pray on the Temple Mount, the holiest site in the Jewish world.
Preserve The Temple Mount
  • For a decade, Muslim religious authorities have participated in the destruction and elimination of precious Jewish and Christian artifacts on the site of Solomon's Temple, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
  • Thousands of tons of earth, containing archaeological evidence dating back to the period of the Temple of Solomon, were discarded. Among the 'rubble' were ancient seals from a Priestly family, inscribed pottery fragments in Ancient Hebrew, Altar screens and broken columns from a fourth century Byzantine Church.
  • Since the year 2000, the Muslim religious authority – the Waqf - has blocked all archaeological oversight of the Temple Mount.
  • Meanwhile, the Waqf continues to construct Mosques on the sacred sites of Jews and Christians.
  • We believe the international and Israeli media should have unrestricted access to the Temple Mount.
  • We believe the world-respected Israeli Antiquities Authority be empowered to supervise the day to day activities on the Temple Mount.
  • Currently, the Waqf forbids any non-Muslim entrance, except on a selective and very limited basis. For instance, the Waqf does not give any observers access inside the vast subterranean rooms, from which many antiquities have been removed.
  • We demand the preservation and respect of the Temple Mount. Only full access and complete transparency for all parts of the Temple Mount can prevent further abuse and destruction of this site which has been venerated throughout history.
 
Interactive 3-D Pan of Old City!
 
See the Dangers to Israel!
 
Get the News Widgets!
 
 
Listen to Audio Israel News!
[05.13.2008]
Listen now to the latest exclusive One Jerusalem Bloggers Conference Call with Caroline Glick, world journalist, policy-analyst and author of, Shackled Warrior: Israel and the Global Jihad.Caroline raises important points about the future of Israel, the centrality of Jerusalem, Barak Obama's anti-Israel advisers,...
Digg This | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Google | Yahoo! | (5) | Listen