Subscribe:      
 
    Tell A Friend  
  From   

« Suicide Bomber Kills Israeli | Home | Archbishop: Sharia Law is Unavoidable in the UK »

Barak Obama and Israel -- Part 2
[02.05.2008]
Comments (8) | Trackback (0) Digg This | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Google | Yahoo!

Comments
I agree with aprpeh. I also agree that Obama is displaying by his choice of advisers how he feels about Israel
 
Posted by: Ruth K Peffer at February 9, 2008 2:50 PM
 
There is really no need for reading chicken entrails as far as Obama is concerned. As the old truism goes look at a man's friends to know who the man is. Well Malley, Wright, Zbiggy and Rice are the friends. What poosible truth or good could there be for Jews or Israel in Obama's soothing sound bites. See Obama for who he is.
 
Posted by: Simon Wajcer at February 8, 2008 8:51 PM
 
im preocupied with B. Obama, born moslem and then converted to christian, may be by convenience, should he be elected as candidate i will prefer to see John Mc. Cain as President.
 
Posted by: Samuel Abecasis at February 8, 2008 7:07 PM
 
Despite his denials to the contrary concerning the accusations that his program seems to be 180 degrees from the present U. S. foreign policy. There is much room for worry on our part. Until he rids himself of the very questionable line-up of advisors it behooves us to wtach and listen very carefully, and to marshal our support in favor of more amenable candidates. Irving Eisenman
 
Posted by: Irrving Eisenman at February 8, 2008 3:13 PM
 
Obama is at best an Islamic apologist and at worst a supporter of Islamic expansion. His background and upbringing leave me wondering where his ultimate loyalties would lie...With America and it's Isreali ally, Or with the Islamists who threaten the very exsitence of the Western world.
 
Posted by: Bookman at February 8, 2008 12:59 PM
 
It appears that B. Hussein Obama is going to reequip our National political drive with some of the same wheels which spun us into a mudhole before, and the new faces will be just as tractionless. This is hardly 'Change'; it is a facade, and we certainly don't need to revisit the embarrassing and debilitating past, especially with an amateur at the helm.
 
Posted by: Photon at February 6, 2008 7:19 PM
 
Having read the interview with Dr. Susan Rice, I find two areas of concern: first, the idea that the foreign policy starts from the American perspective and works or orients out to other parts of the world; secondly, the belief in the time necessary for face-to-face diplomatic dealings with Iran, and the belief that those encounters will be efficacious in bringing about a peaceful resolution to Iran's nuclear plans. Would Mr. Obama be supportive of these perspectives specified by Dr. Rice? From the rhetoric I have heard on TV and read in The Jerusalem Post, Mr. Obama has been outspoken about his desire to meet with Iranian officials. I am not sure what he understands about the apparent assessment of the National Intelligence Assessment concerning Iran's present status vis-a-vis its nuclear program. Notwithstanding, I do know that Israel's intelligence is in disagreement as to the time Iran will possess a nuclear warhead: Israel's assessment has designated a time period of Iranian nuclear readiness perhaps in three years or less. Another concern I have with Dr. Rice relative to the article about the "President Bush's justification of the use of pre-emptive military strikes against a threatening enemy" is the following: Would Mr. Obama. as the President of the United States, meddle in Israel's employment of pre-emptive strikes in Syria, Gaza, Iran? Since Israel's intelligence does not correspond with the NIE's take on Iran's capability and intention, what should I, as a Jewish-American (Israeli citizen), interpret as the stance most beneficial to Israel? I would and will say that Mr. Obama's potential for comprehending the real serious threats that Gaza as well as the PA and Iran pose to Israel as being insufficient in addition to counterproductive. I hear and read too much America first and too little regard for Israel's needs. The chance for tragedy's resulting from such an America-first perspective, especially when having to work in such a constrained time frame according to Israeli intelligence, seems too high to risk my vote for Mr. Obama.
 
Posted by: Yoel Nitzarim at February 6, 2008 4:33 PM
 
keep up the pressure. there is no right to be President or even the nominee of a party. Obama is displaying by his choice of advisers either ignorance or tacit approval of their credibility.
 
Posted by: aprpeh at February 6, 2008 10:26 AM
 
 
Post a Comment
(Not Displayed)
 
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.onejerusalem.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1077
 
Sign Israel Petitions!
 
 
Sign Jerusalem Petition
 
Sign Temple Mount Petition
 
Send Me One Jerusalem Updates
United Jerusalem Petition
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, to ensure free and open access for all people.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, as an expression of the unique relationship between the Jewish People and its eternal capital.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, so as never to return to the dark period of 1947-67, when Arab control over an artificially divided Jerusalem meant religious persecution, desecration of holy sites, and wanton destruction.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, according to the current municipal boundaries, set in the wake of Israel’s defensive 1967 Six Day War.
  • I support a unified Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, where Jews may enjoy the right to pray on the Temple Mount, the holiest site in the Jewish world.
Preserve The Temple Mount
  • For a decade, Muslim religious authorities have participated in the destruction and elimination of precious Jewish and Christian artifacts on the site of Solomon's Temple, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
  • Thousands of tons of earth, containing archaeological evidence dating back to the period of the Temple of Solomon, were discarded. Among the 'rubble' were ancient seals from a Priestly family, inscribed pottery fragments in Ancient Hebrew, Altar screens and broken columns from a fourth century Byzantine Church.
  • Since the year 2000, the Muslim religious authority – the Waqf - has blocked all archaeological oversight of the Temple Mount.
  • Meanwhile, the Waqf continues to construct Mosques on the sacred sites of Jews and Christians.
  • We believe the international and Israeli media should have unrestricted access to the Temple Mount.
  • We believe the world-respected Israeli Antiquities Authority be empowered to supervise the day to day activities on the Temple Mount.
  • Currently, the Waqf forbids any non-Muslim entrance, except on a selective and very limited basis. For instance, the Waqf does not give any observers access inside the vast subterranean rooms, from which many antiquities have been removed.
  • We demand the preservation and respect of the Temple Mount. Only full access and complete transparency for all parts of the Temple Mount can prevent further abuse and destruction of this site which has been venerated throughout history.
 
Interactive 3-D Pan of Old City!
 
See the Dangers to Israel!
 
Get the News Widgets!
 
 
Listen to Audio Israel News!
[05.13.2008]
Listen now to the latest exclusive One Jerusalem Bloggers Conference Call with Caroline Glick, world journalist, policy-analyst and author of, Shackled Warrior: Israel and the Global Jihad.Caroline raises important points about the future of Israel, the centrality of Jerusalem, Barak Obama's anti-Israel advisers,...
Digg This | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Google | Yahoo! | (5) | Listen